Smart City Index 2020
Cape Town
% of respondents who chose the Priority Area
PRIORITY AREAS
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
unemployment affordable housing security basic amenities corruption health services fulfilling employment school education public transport road congestion air pollution citizen engagement green spaces recycling social mobility
68.0%
From a list of 15 indicators, survey respondents were asked to select 5 that they perceived as the most urgent for their city. This is the total bar. The higher the percentage of responses per area, the greater the priority for the city. The left hand section of each bar shows the Alignment - the proportion of those respondents who also answered the corresponding survey questions low. A strong Alignment implies that these areas also demand priority attention.
61.3%
55.9%
SMART CITY RANKING 103
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
55.1%
51.4%
47.6%
City
41.7%
30.4%
Population 3,660,000
26.3% 25.9%
14.2%
10.9%
(UN World Cities Report)
8.9%
Out of 109
8.1%
6.5%
▼ 93 in 2019
% of respondents who agree or strongly agree with the statement
ATTITUDES
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Map tiles by Stamen Design CC BY 3.0 Map Data © OpenStreetMap
You are willing to concede personal data in order to improve traffic congestion You are comfortable with face recognition technologies to lower crime You feel the availability of online information has increased your trust in authorities The proportion of your day-to-day payment transactions that are non-cash (% of transactions)
74.1%
2015 0.699 62.6 13.8 10.1 12,052
0.702 63.2 13.7 2016 10.2 11,908
11,864 2017 13.7 10.2 63.5 0.704
2018 0.705
1 yr change
Country HDI Life expectancy at Birth Expected years of schooling Mean years of schooling GNI per capita (PPP $)
84.2%
+0.001 +0.4 +0.0 +0.0 -108.0
74.5%
SMART CITY RATING
63.9 13.7
69.2%
10.2 11,756
LEGEND:
GROUP MEAN
CITY
D
LEGEND:
MIN
CITY MEAN
GROUP MAX
STRUCTURES
TECHNOLOGIES
C in 2019
Score
Score
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Health & Safety
Health & Safety
54.7 29.6 45.3 39.8 55.5 35.8
56.7 51.5 54.7 57.2 33.7 54.8 53.4 43.9 43.2 58.7 62.5
Basic sanitation meets the needs of the poorest areas
Online reporting of city maintenance problems provides a speedy solution A website or App allows residents to easily give away unwanted items
Recycling services are satisfactory Public safety is not a problem
TECHNOLOGIES C FACTOR RATINGS D STRUCTURES
Free public wifi has improved access to city services CCTV cameras has made residents feel safer
Air pollution is not a problem
Medical services provision is satisfactory
A website or App allows residents to effectively monitor air pollution Arranging medical appointments online has improved access
Finding housing with rent equal to 30% or less of a monthly salary is not a problem
Mobility
Mobility
49.2 35.2
Traffic congestion is not a problem Public transport is satisfactory
Car-sharing Apps have reduced congestion
Apps that direct you to an available parking space have reduced journey time Bicycle hiring has reduced congestion Online scheduling and ticket sales has made public transport easier to use The city provides information on traffic congestion through mobile phones
Activities
Activities
76.6 66.9
80.8
Green spaces are satisfactory
Online purchasing of tickets to shows and museums has made it easier to attend
Cultural activities (shows, bars, and museums) are satisfactory
Opportunities (Work & School)
Opportunities (Work & School)
71.0 57.6 58.9 65.1
51.2 54.1 53.2 51.1 48.3
Employment finding services are readily available Most children have access to a good school
Online access to job listings has made it easier to find work
GROUP
IT skills are taught well in schools
Lifelong learning opportunities are provided by local institutions
Online services provided by the city has made it easier to start a new business
4
Businesses are creating new jobs
The current internet speed and reliability meet connectivity needs
Minorities feel welcome
Governance
Governance
50.9 39.4 59.5 26.1
60.4 50.1 41.4 47.0
Information on local government decisions are easily accessible Corruption of city officials is not an issue of concern Residents contribute to decision making of local government Residents provide feedback on local government projects
Online public access to city finances has reduced corruption
Online voting has increased participation
All ratings range from AAA to D
An online platform where residents can propose ideas has improved city life Processing Identification Documents online has reduced waiting times
39
Made with FlippingBook Publishing Software